Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Inspiration

The government just made buying an EV much less exciting

Simón Gomez
By

It’s hard not to conclude that when Joe Manchin, the powerful Democratic senator for West Virginia, announced on Sunday that, unbeknownst to President Joe Biden, he would not vote for the Build Back Better bill in its current form, he also stepped hard on the brakes of America’s transition to electric vehicles, putting a clean mobility future further away from our reach than it was before.

The Build Back Better plan is the $2 trillion tax-and-spending program at the heart of President Joe Biden’s economic agenda, which includes a generous $12,500 tax rebate incentive for the purchase of electric vehicles, whose prices still command a substantial premium over their gas-powered counterparts. This proposed EV incentive includes the current $7,500 tax credit to buy plug-in EVs, plus an extra $500 if the car’s battery is made in the U.S. It also includes a $4,500 tax credit if the EV was assembled in the U.S. using organized union labor.

Related Videos

Without the availability of those incentives for potential buyers, the sales of electric vehicles may have a hard time reaching the goal established by the Biden administration that half of all new cars sold in the U.S. by 2030 should be electric (in 2020, sales of EV accounted for about 2% of total car sales in the U.S.).

How right is that conclusion? There are two reasons that indicate that the picture may not be as gloomy as it seems.

Manufacturers have invested a lot in EVs

In September 2019, Daimler, owner of Mercedes-Benz, announced that it was halting all development of new internal combustion engines to concentrate on electric vehicles. The German luxury automaker is not alone. Volkswagen (currently the world’s biggest automaker) is investing big in EVs, promising to go fully electric in Europe by 2035 and in the U.S. and China shortly after that. 

Just last week, Toyota showed a convoy of 15 Toyota- and Lexus-branded EV prototypes in various stages of development, announced a global investment of $70 billion in the electrification of its lineup, and committed to making Lexus a 100% EV brand by the end of the decade. 

Former GM’s Detroit-Hamtramck, now Factory ZERO, received a massive $2.2 billion investment to build a variety of all-electric trucks and SUVs. (Photo by Jeffrey Sauger for General Motors)

Locally, Ford has pledged to invest $30 billion in electric vehicles through 2025, and says it expects 40% to 50% of its global vehicle volume to be fully electric by 2030. Its crosstown archrival, General Motors, announced plans to sell only electric cars and trucks by 2035, has committed to spending $27 billion to introduce 30 electric vehicle models by 2025, and is building a plant in Ohio to make batteries for those cars and trucks. 

Smaller manufacturers have also made their own pledges; the boldest among them are Volvo committing to go fully electric by 2030 and Jaguar Land Rover, committing to make Jaguar fully electric and have five Land Rover EVs in the market by 2025.

Governments are taking measures against polluting automobiles

Some western European nations have announced bans on sales and registrations of cars equipped with internal combustion engines within the next two decades. Norway leads the pack having established 2025 as its deadline, followed by Iceland, Ireland, the Netherlands, Slovenia, and Sweden in 2030, Denmark and the United Kingdom in 2035, and France and Spain in 2040. Germany, Italy, Portugal, and Switzerland are still holdouts.

In the Americas, only the state of California, Canada, and Costa Rica have established firm deadlines: 2035, 2040, and 2050 respectively, although Québec moved its goal to 2035. All of Canada, however, will allow sales and registrations of plug-in hybrid EVs.

A Ford Mustang Mach-E receives a charge from a Ford F-150 Lightning. (Ford)

Last November, during the 2021 United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP26) in Glasgow, Ford, General Motors, Mercedes-Benz, Volvo, Jaguar Land Rover, and the Chinese BYD, together with 30 countries, signed a pledge to stop sales of new gas and diesel vehicles by 2040 globally, and by 2035 in “leading markets.” Sadly, the government of three of the biggest leading markets — the United States, China, and Japan — and major automakers like the Nissan-Renault-Mitsubishi Alliance, Toyota, and Volkswagen, refrained from signing the nonbinding pledge.

President Biden still believes that he and Manchin can reach an agreement on the passage of the Build Back Better bill, but whether the tax credits for EV purchases survive the changes necessary to appease Manchin, who opposes to the measure because it would only apply to EVs made in America by unionized workers, is still in the air. But the failure of Build Back Better will not prevent the inevitable death of the internal combustion engine and the unstoppable advent of EVs as our primary form of transportation. It will just make it a little bit harder and less exciting for car buyers looking to make their purchase a little less expensive.

Editors' Recommendations

Topics
Is rented furniture the solution to supply chain issues?
Small living space with eclectic furniture

Furniture sales have skyrocketed throughout the Covid-19 pandemic as people have been spending more time in their homes. But actually getting the furniture to the customers is another story entirely. With material shortages, factory shutdowns, and worldwide shipping problems, supply chain issues are causing extraordinary delays in manufacturing and delivering consumer goods. For many brands and customers, the way around this issue is obvious: rented furniture. Keep reading to learn more about the pros and cons of renting home furnishings and a few services you should consider renting from.

Pros of renting furniture
Along with subverting supply chain issues, there are many benefits to filling your home with rental furniture. Here are a few of the best reasons to forgo buying new furniture and rent instead.
No long-term commitments
According to the U.S. Census, Americans move houses an estimated 11 or more times throughout their lifetimes. Over time, the cost of moving furniture can really add up, particularly during long-distance moves. With rental furniture, there are no long-term commitments. You can keep your furnishings for as long as needed and, when you move again, start fresh with new rented pieces.
Sustainability
Renting furniture is often a more sustainable choice. Furniture rental companies offer durable goods and ensure their pieces are always clean and kept in good condition. With the increased focus on maintenance, each piece of furniture remains in use longer than purchased furniture usually is. This keeps more furniture out of landfills, decreasing your environmental impact.
Can be less expensive
When it comes to affordability, renting furniture can be a wiser choice in some situations. Rental companies provide individual items and room packages at various price points, making it easy to find one that fits your budget. And, if you only plan to keep your pieces for a short period, you could be saving thousands.
Fast and easy delivery
Thanks to supply chain issues, you may be waiting months before receiving the piece of furniture you ordered online. One of the best perks of furniture rental is the fast and easy delivery. While they may charge an extra fee, the company often handles delivery, assembly, and pick-up. Plus, they will offer the earliest delivery date possible, as soon as the next day.

Read more
EV charging’s coming to your town: you still need it at home
why you need ev charging at home small 703 electrifyhomeannouncesavailabilityofhomestationelectricvehiclecharger

As things stand today, the ownership of an electric vehicle implies a paradigm shift in thinking regarding our car’s energy replenishment habits. Driving an EV means that the conveniently quick stop at the service station we are used to is replaced by hours-long charging sessions, with basically the same results regarding the amount of range acquired. However, the savings, as well as the benefits for the environment, are both undeniable and substantial.

There are several ongoing efforts currently in the United States to create an infrastructure for charging electric vehicles, which together with plug-in hybrid cars, that also require charging, should account for half of the new automobiles sold in the United States by 2030 according to the federal government. But even with all of these efforts, you still need an EV adapter at home if you plan to own an electric vehicle.

Read more
Are electric cars better for the environment? The real truth
are electric cars better for the environment volvo c40 recharge fjord blue

Environmentally conscious car shoppers often wonder, "Are electric cars better for the environment?" It's true that operating an electric vehicle is significantly less harmful to the environment than operating its gasoline-powered counterpart. EVs do not create harmful carbon emissions that affect our health and contribute to the greenhouse effect, while gas-powered cars do. So it seems obvious that electric cars are definitely better for the environment, right? Well, that's not the whole story.

The problem is that the operation of an electric vehicle is only one factor in the equation necessary to assess its environmental impact. To know the entire story, we also need to take into account the carbon emitted during the EV manufacturing process as well as during the generation of the power that the EV will eventually use. These are not static factors, and thankfully they tend to decrease as technology progresses: Manufacturers implement measures to achieve carbon neutrality, and utilities replace coal with sustainable power sources, creating greener power grids. 

Read more